Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

6 January 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< January 05	January 07 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

MediaWiki version history

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has absolutely no reason to exist. It's an unsourced duplicate of mw:Release notes and mw:Version lifecycle. The "notable changes" column is entirely original research. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

India naming dispute

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are various disputes over this name and have been sufficiently covered with Names of India.

This subject fails WP:GNG on its own and article is just an expansion of a POV and involves use of mostly unreliable sources. - Ratnahastin (talk) 05:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Necrofauna

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is horribly outdated and has not been updated since 2017 outside of bot edits. It still treats de-extinction as a far future hypothetical event when there have been numerous successful de-extinctions since then such as the Judean date palm, tsori, aurochs, Montreal melon, and Floreana giant tortoise. The term is also not widely used outside of one book, and everything discussed on the page is mentioned on or can be mentioned on the main de-extinction page. Edelgardvonhresvelg (talk) 04:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 January 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Personal wiki

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a WP:REDUNDANTFORK of List of wiki software with no useful salvageable value.

The section "Multi-user wiki software" lacks any useful inclusion criterion - MediaWiki (the software that this wiki runs on) does not have a "personal edition" in any reasonable sense. Yes, it's configurable enough you can use it for a lot of things, but the standard for when that would be would be entirely arbitrary. Most of the remaining entries do not have any mention of personal wikis in their article.

The section "Single-user wiki software" is almost entirely duplicated at List of wiki software#Personal wiki software.

The rest of this article is just a trivial definition of the concept - "a personal wiki is a wiki for personal use". And that's it. Delete or redirect to List of wiki software#Personal wiki software (since an individual instance of a personal wiki is by definition a complete nonentity with no existence outside of that of its sole user the software is the only significant bit). * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Avani Soni

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The actor is not notable. Most of the sources in the article are promotional/PR sources. The consensus on previous AfD was delete because it was non-notable and created by PR agency. Coderzombie (talk) 04:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Gujarat. Coderzombie (talk) 04:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Savannah Smith

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable former college basketball player (only appeared to play off the bench for ~3 seasons). Fails WP:GNG as notability WP:NOTINHERITED from Chris Christian (father). Epluribusunumyall (talk) 03:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Sports, Basketball, and Texas. Epluribusunumyall (talk) 03:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arsenal Women 2–3 Wolfsburg Women

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article does not meet WP:NSPORTSEVENT (the specific notability guideline for a single match) nor any general notability guidelines. This is because it is not an individually notable match in itself, as just one of a series of knockout games in regular competition, and because it does not appear to have much media coverage that is not WP:ROUTINE. It therefore does not meet any of the four criteria for NSPORTSEVENT, and the lack of non-primary sourcing prevents it from meeting GNG. Kingsif (talk) 03:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Puppy love

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As noted in a message on the page, 'This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic.' The article contains a non-dictionary definition and characteristics of puppy love, a sub-article on puppy love in China related to China's marriage age laws, and statistics which do not mention puppy love of Taiwan, China and the United States. Though the article has existed for a long time, it is still rated as 'Start-class' on Wikipedia's content assessment scale (see the Talk page). The article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignemnt between 24 January 2023 and 19 May 2023, and yet is still rated as a 'Start-class'. There was a requested move on 9 February 2023. The article is not encyclopedic in nature, and is minimally informative, I'd recommend deleting it. Re34646 (talk) 03:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Heiberger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing genuine evidence of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. A couple of brief interviews, but the rest are PR, non-independent, or passing mentions. Seems like a run of the mill businessman. —Ganesha811 (talk) 03:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and New York. —Ganesha811 (talk) 03:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd agree, a non-notable person. Re34646 (talk) 03:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with deletion, the most notability-instilling source cited is a NYT "30-minute interview" but that was part of a series of short interviews of "prominent developers, brokers, property managers and builders in New York commercial real estate", which is a specifically narrow scope and to me does not indicate that the subjects of those interviews are necessarily notable enough for WP:GNG (and is maybe even borderline non-WP:IS). Jokullmusic 05:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Benedikt Johannes Hofer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. None of the sources are reliable (tiiny.site is user-generated), and I found no reliable sources online. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 03:17, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Computing, and Germany. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 03:17, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Lent-Koop

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find any WP:SIGCOV on this player. Everything that comes up, both in searches and in the references, is either WP:LOCAL or databases/signing announcements. Appears to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 03:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Taiwanese sentiment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient WP:RS here to merit a stand-alone article Amigao (talk) 03:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Taiwan. Skynxnex (talk) 03:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced Technology Development Center

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Insufficient independent in-depth sources to establish notability. Imcdc Contact 02:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Organizations, Companies, United States of America, and Georgia (U.S. state). Imcdc Contact 02:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: I found two independent sources ([1], [2]) and added them to the article, but I'm not sure about reliability and the first one seems pretty promotional. I'd be more confident if someone could find another piece of coverage that isn't connected to the ATDC or Georgia Tech. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to try another relisting before considering closing this discussion as No consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rachid Ghanimi

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been rejected as a draft and deleted already. This its third incarnation, and I still can't find any WP:SIGCOV of this player. The player still appears to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 03:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 03:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NOLYMPICS. It was deleted as WP:TOOSOON but then he won an Olympic medal. St Anselm (talk) 03:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Haven't searched for sources yet, but note that he passes WP:NOLYMPICS as a medalist at the 2024 Summer Olympics; he'd be the sole 2024 medalist without an article, I think, if deleted. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:07, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I note the French article has 26 references - we can safely assume there are lots of sources in Arabic. This is precisely why we have WP:NOLYMPICS. St Anselm (talk) 03:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Haven't done a comprehensive review of the Arabic sources, but the references I viewed didn't contain any WP:SIGCOV of Ghanimi specifically. While the subject was on the team for the Olympics and won a medal, he didn't appear in any matches from what I can tell. Still undecided here. Let'srun (talk) 03:26, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Olympics. Let'srun (talk) 03:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – This time is enough WP:SIGCOV to estabilish the article. Svartner (talk) 04:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Information Processing Society of China

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks to be almost entirely self-promotional in nature. Amigao (talk) 02:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Organizations, Computing, and China. Skynxnex (talk) 03:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draft:Millennium Force's effects

Yutong Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability using WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 02:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Transportation, and China. Skynxnex (talk) 03:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Restore redirect to Yutong, this new article does not provide any additional context or knowledge that cannot be put in the Yutong article. Jumpytoo Talk 05:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Randolph

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only thing approaching WP:SIGCOV that I could find is this, but it is from the student newspaper of one of his colleges, and it was published while he was a student at UNC–Wilmington. So it is WP:LOCAL. As a result, this player appears to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 02:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Monroe (soccer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This player appears to fail WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Everything I could find was either passing, "local" by his college, club, or league, or database/signing announcement—nothing of significant, meaningful coverage. Anwegmann (talk) 02:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 02:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miche-Naider Chéry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Several searches have not uncovered any WP:SIGCOV of this player. None of the sources cited in the article meet those standards as well. This player, then, seems to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Max Glasser

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Am I missing something here? I can find a lot of announcements and "local" coverage, either from USL, FC Naples, or UC Davis, but there doesn't seem to be any WP:SIGCOV on this player. Possibly WP:TOOSOON, but still seems to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Creek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't seem to find any WP:SIGCOV on this player. Perhaps it's a matter of WP:TOOSOON, as he is in the beginning of his career and has seen the field a few times, but right now, he seems to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 02:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 02:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Missouri. Shellwood (talk) 02:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify – WP:TOOSOON. Svartner (talk) 04:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Y Tu Tambien

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by a single purpose editor and marked for notability concerns 10 years ago. 12 of the 18 sources are Facebook, the other sources do not cover this organization in detail. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, and New York. LibStar (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Belarus–Spain relations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is based primarily on primary sources. 4 of the 6 sources are the Spanish Foreign Affairs, the 1st source is an embassy website. There is no third party significant coverage of these relations. LibStar (talk) 02:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Belarus, and Spain. LibStar (talk) 02:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ LibStar (talk) 00:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]

World Institute of Pain

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted. Still fails WP:ORG. Sole source is a primary source. LibStar (talk) 00:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Medicine, and North Carolina. LibStar (talk) 00:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

All-time Tampa Bay Rowdies roster

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject appears to lack notability under WP:LISTN due to a lack of sourcing. PROD was removed with the claim that this grouping is notable, but no sources have been added since so I'm bringing this to AfD. Let'srun (talk) 00:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Football, Lists, and Florida. Let'srun (talk) 00:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Halifax train crash

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This run of the mill crash with zero fatalities does not appear to have the WP:LASTING coverage to meet WP:NEVENT here. Let'srun (talk) 00:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and North Carolina. Let'srun (talk) 00:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WineGUI

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed with insufficient reasoning, just "Stop deleting this wiki page". No notability whatsoever. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 00:34, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: All you can find are download links and blog posts, nothing we'd use for reviews or any critical discussion. What's in the article for sourcing isn't helpful. Oaktree b (talk) 01:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No notability GUI, also, the article haves only primary source. Vitorperrut555 (talk) 01:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sandwitches

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article with no indication of notability or importance. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 00:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No content here, only infobox. Vitorperrut555 (talk) 01:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Don't delete This has a good amount of history that dates back to 2011. At the very least, retarget back to Goblin (album) and/or draftify the current content. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 02:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Armageddon Through Your Speakers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an album by a band that doesn't have an article on here. Doesn't establish why this album is notable. LupinOnTheFritz (talk) 00:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Can only find links to Discogs and social media. Does not seem to be a notable album from 20 some years ago. No critical commentary, no reviews. Oaktree b (talk) 00:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]